Randomish things
Jan. 3rd, 2026 03:50 pmThis one got occluded by festivities - Converts by Melanie McDonagh review – roads to Rome:
There is, too, a notable lack of women in this book, notwithstanding chapters on Gwen John, Spark and the Oxford philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe.
So, not just literary stars who took The Road to Rome and NO LETITIA FAIRFIELD who probably breaks a lot of the patterns by continuing to be a left-wing and feminist (stroppily so) public health doctor and vocal against what we would now call patriarchal misogyny within the Church (she was so Dame Rebecca's sister even if they didn't get on).
***
Lucy Mangan on John Lewis's 'members' lounge' - I have a distant recollection that back in the day when department stores were first A Thing, they did in fact have lounges where shopping ladies could repose themselves, along with facilities. Probably not drinkies and chocs, though.
***
The only known photographs of mathematician and computing pioneer Ada Lovelace have been acquired by the National Portrait Gallery just before they were expected to be sold to a private buyer. Fairly early instances of the photographic art, too.
***
Murkying the waters: The Lies and Falsifications of Oliver Sacks:
Rachel Aviv explored the personal journals of the celebrated neurologist and writer Oliver Sacks. What she found was shocking: he had fabricated and embellished some of his most well-known work — like Awakenings and The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat.
***
On a rather different diary story: the prolonged saga of publishing Pepys: who would have believed this, over whether to go ahead and include all Samuel's more smutty adventures:
In 1960, while Penguin was being prosecuted for the publication of Lady Chatterley’s Lover, Magdalene sought the advice of its fellows on whether to proceed with a complete edition. C.S. Lewis argued that it would be ‘pusillanimous and unscholarly’ to hold back. Society, he wrote, was already so corrupted that the supposed further harm of ‘printing a few, obscure and widely separated passages in a very long and expensive book, seems to me unrealistic or even hypocritical’.
Yay Jack!




